|
Daniele Florean , Goethe Universität Frankfurt
Daniela Grunow, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
Natalie Nitsche, Australian National University
Linkages between gender norms and fertility levels have been much discussed in demography. It’s been argued that when women’s growing participation in the public sphere is accompanied by sticky gender rigidity in the private sphere, women are double-burdened, and fertility declines until gender norms flexibilize, too. Extended to the couple-level, this argument implies higher (first) birth rates among couples with two egalitarian partners, at least compared with attitudinal mismatched couples (e.g. egalitarian woman and traditional man), especially in rigid or transforming gender normative societies. However, this hypothesis has rarely been tested with couple-level data, despite its potential for testing the ‘gender revolution’ argument more directly. Our study fills this gap. We examine whether partners’ gender ideological pairings predict couples’ time to first birth in Germany, with data from the Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam), using several attitudinal measures. Contrary to the gender revolution hypothesis, we find the fastest transition to first birth among couples with shared gender-traditional attitudes. followed by couples with shared moderate gender attitudes. Shared egalitarian couples and attitudinally mismatched couples exhibit the slowest transition to parenthood, en par with attitudinal mismatched couples. Interestingly, attitudinal items pertaining to the gendered division of labor are powerful predictors of couples’ transition to first birth, while attitudinal measures on the child-parent relationships don’t predict the time to first birth after adding socio-demographic controls. Implications for extending the gender revolution argument toward considerations on first birth postponement and couple-level dynamics are discussed.
Presented in Session 108. Fertility and Gender Equity